
February cover for 'Dallas Child'
I’m a masochist. It’s the only explanation that makes sense.
Every month I pick up a copy of ‘Dallas Child’ magazine and every month I want to gouge out my own eyes—after first destroying all of the presses on which this magazine is printed, of course.
Sometimes, I’m simply bemused by the hey-look-at-me approach of the “Real Mom” pieces or the obvious b.s. in the “A Day In the Life …” meanderings. (Note to the ‘Dallas Child’ editorial staff—you might want to pad the time lines you craft; no one with kids gets dressed and out the door in 10 minutes flat).
Each month, however, I can be certain that I’ll be completely pissed off by the final column—”the manifesto” by Rudy Klancnik. February’s issue didn’t disappoint.
He spends the entire page going on and on about how he’s an enlightened father, and won’t push his children “toward all-star statuses in Select sports.” I’m fine with that decision, and even applaud it. Until he describes why.
He won’t do it because there’s no guaranteed return on the investment. Or, as he writes
There’s just so much time and money spent trekking alongside the U-12 travel club or the All-Star Super Selects that I’m not quite sure I’m equipped for the challenge. Or if I even want to be. If all that time and money doesn’t result in a four-year ride to a prominent college, can you demand a refund? Uh, didn’t think so.
Jackass. There are so many things wrong with just that statement that it’s hard to know where to begin. So I think I’ll make just five points.
1) There are some very prominent universities that don’t give scholarships for athletics. In fact, I can think of eight as quickly as blinking. That’s right, gentlemen, there are no scholarships in the Ivy League. But discipline, passion, teamwork and dedication could help your children be better applicants. Those things are crucial when acceptance rates are under 10% at places like Yale.
2) Forget the end-game with its scholarships and applications. Isn’t it possible that the children want to be great at something? Isn’t it possible that they have a burning desire to reach for their own dreams? Maybe they don’t need an overbearing dad pushing them to spend the 10,000 hours the experts say is necessary for greatness.
I spent most of my weekends during Junior High and High School hopping onto buses before dawn to go to wrestling tournaments. (Yes, they happen in the summer too.) My parents didn’t push me. Heck, they didn’t even understand the sport I love. But I had their support when they could give it.
I wish to this day they had been able to be at events more than they were.
By stating that he doesn’t find it “fun or fulfilling,” I have a feeling that Mr. Klancnik’s offspring will sense his lack of interest and pride in their accomplishments. Perhaps they already sense an inability to have his approval. And that would be a tragedy.
3) The teamwork, leadership and goal setting skills that are developed through sports are a bigger return on investment than can be quantified by any scholarship.
4) Shouldn’t the question be if the children find it fun and fulfilling? Isn’t that the first criteria?
5) There are no guarantees about anything we do as dads. Put on your big-boy pants and deal with it.
Yeah, I’ll keep picking up ‘Dallas Child’ to check the calendar and see what activities TheKiddo™ and I can enjoy. I just know that I’ll want to remove my ability to see at some point. Dads, you’ve been warned.
I would suggest you check out Mr. Klancnik on twitter, but since he only updates his feed once a month or so, there isn’t much point. Guess he doesn’t find that fulfilling or fun either. Which makes me wonder why they publish his twitter info.
Come to think of it, I’m wondering why they publish his work at all.